Motif Study · Birds & Animals
Insects and Butterflies in Arts and Crafts Pattern
The clearest documented butterfly in Arts and Crafts design is a bronzed copper buckle by Talwin Morris, not a William Morris pattern. This study describes what the evidence shows and flags what it does not.

On this page
A buckle in the form of stylised butterflies, bronzed copper set with green glass, designed and made by Talwin Morris in Glasgow about 1900, is the one fully documented Arts and Crafts butterfly design in the museum records used for this study. The Victoria and Albert Museum holds the piece under museum number O110926. No supplied record identifies insects or butterflies in any William Morris or Morris and Co. design, so this motif study centres on the Glasgow buckle and treats the Morris side as an open question.
A butterfly buckle in bronzed copper
The Victoria and Albert Museum records the buckle as designed and made by Talwin Morris, in bronzed copper set with green glass, with the butterflies treated in a stylised form rather than naturalistically. The museum dates it to about 1900 and lists it under museum number O110926.
The design was not a private experiment. According to the V&A's record, the buckle was illustrated in 'Modern Design in Jewellery and Fans' in the Studio magazine in 1901-02, which places it among the small metalwork designs the magazine showed to its readers.
Talwin Morris and the Glasgow style
Talwin Morris worked in Glasgow, where the V&A notes he also designed books for the publisher Blackie & Son and was close to Charles Rennie Mackintosh and Margaret MacDonald. The butterflies on the buckle belong to that circle's world of linear, abstracted ornament rather than to Morris and Co.'s workshop practice.
The V&A's own reading of these buckles places them in a distinctive Glasgow style of the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, shaped by symbolist art, Art Nouveau and Japanese design, and reflected in more abstract, linear motifs. On that account the buckle's butterflies are flattened and geometric, described through line and metal colour rather than wing detail.
What the Morris record does and does not show
No source supplied for this study identifies a William Morris wallpaper, textile or glass design that shows insects or butterflies. The documented ground for Morris's pattern making is botanical instead. According to the V&A, his wallpaper patterns drew mainly on plants he had observed since childhood, and also on plant images in illuminated manuscripts, tapestries, woodcuts and historical books, including John Gerarde's The Herball or Generall Historie of Plantes of 1597.
That is a flower and foliage record, not an entomological one, and the difference matters for anyone hunting an arts and crafts butterfly pattern under Morris's name. Readers who want the wider animal picture can turn to birds in Morris designs, where the documented species record is fuller, and to our guide to meaning in Morris patterns for what Morris himself said about significance in ornament. Any design marketed as a Morris butterfly should be checked against museum records before it is accepted.
Using butterflies at home, from the evidence
The documented example suggests what a period butterfly motif looks like in practice: a stylised, linear insect form worked in metal with glass accents, small in scale and made as a decorative fitting. Following the V&A's description of the Glasgow style, the safe instinct is stylisation over literal depiction, butterflies reduced to line and shape rather than illustrated specimens.
Small metalwork and jewellery are therefore the most defensible route for the motif, on the evidence here. If you are building a scheme around Arts and Crafts ornament, our all products collection gathers the designs covered elsewhere on the site.
Open questions for researchers
This study could not resolve several points, and it is clearer to list them than to paper over them.
Points this study could not verify from the supplied records:
- No Morris or Morris and Co. design showing insects or butterflies is identified in the sources used, so the motif's presence in the firm's output remains unproven here.
- No writing by William Morris on insects or butterflies is quoted in the evidence, so his views on the motif are unknown on this record.
- No botanical or zoological identification source is supplied for any insect or butterfly depiction discussed here.
- No named author's interpretation of the insect or butterfly motif appears in the evidence, so no symbolic reading can responsibly be offered.
The practical consequence for collectors and researchers is simple: treat any claimed Morris butterfly design with caution until a museum record supports it. For how Morris's documented birds and beasts were actually drawn, see more on Webb's birds and animals, which covers Philip Webb's role as the firm's animal designer.
For the wider animal motif picture, continue to our guide to birds in Morris designs, where the documented species record is far fuller than the butterfly one.
Sources & further reading
- Victoria and Albert MuseumV&A O110926: Museum collection databaseRead source
- Victoria and Albert MuseumWilliam Morris and historical design · V&AMuseum articleRead source


